Without reservation, I am a deep-seated admirer of Geoff Dyer’s work. Since reading his D. H. Lawrence book I have continued through each of his titles. Last year I went to a talk that Dyer gave on Camus, (available here, but registration needed for the full video. It is worth it when you have a free 55 minutes.), when he spoke of Camus as a kindred spirit. It is a similar, extraordinary kinship I feel for Dyer’s writing. There is a connection beyond some murky similarities in our backgrounds.
Dyer’s latest book Zona has as its foundation Andrei Tarkovsky’s film Stalker, which has haunted me through three successive viewings. I am far from finished with Stalker so I am thrilled Dyer chose (and was permitted) to weave his discourse around (almost) a shot by shot post-mortem of the film. If you haven’t read Dyer before or seen Stalker, I recommend you watch the film and start elsewhere with Dyer.
At one point Dyer writes,
There are no clichés in Tarkovsky: no clichés of plot, of framing, no clichés of music to underline the emotional meaning of a scene (or, as is more usually the case, to compensate or make good for an emotional meaning that would be absent were it not for the music). Actually, we need to qualify this slightly; there are no one else’s clichés in Tarkovsky.
By the time you’ve read several of Geoff Dyer’s books, fiction or non-fiction (these categories become irrelevant), the same statement could so easily apply. Conceptually and in its realisation Zona is reliant on Dyerian cliché, but that is not a negation of the book’s virtuosity. Dyer’s writing is idiosyncratically brilliant for its immunity from the traditional contrivances of literature. Ostensibly about Stalker, Dyer digresses far from his original theme. This latest Dyer is brilliant, but on this occasion please don’t expect objectivity.
I’ve just put this on my to read list. I love Stalker too and can’t wait to read this analysis (and more by the sound of what you say).
I’d love to hear your opinion when you’ve read it.
I too found stalker a haunting film and have this on my wishlist ,although hope it is not the start of a trend of writers doing films scene by scene ,all the best stu
Dyer only just carries off the concept; I can imagine lesser writers making some very dull scene by scene books of films.
Oh I am so, so excited to read this. Stalker is one of my favourite films, or was a few years ago when I saw it several times. I’ve been having awful trouble getting my hands on a copy to rewatch it; I think I shall just have to buy it because obviously I cannot read the Dyer book without having seen the film again. I am thinking it might be ideal to read it while the movie plays in the background…
Thanks for the link to that lecture. I don’t have 55 spare minutes at this moment, but I will watch it as soon as I do.
Thanks for visiting and commenting, Alice. I think reading the book and watching Stalker simultaneously is a great idea, though Dyer’s writing is quite discursive.