Since I was seventeen I’ve read Nietzsche. I can no longer recall what I read first, probably the yellowing Thus Spake Zarathustra, annotated in two different pens, that still sits on my bookshelf. Nietzsche understands teenagers. He speaks to their complexity and anguish, and they approve of his desire to shatter the tenets of their culture. Nietzsche faced down the nihilism of his age with style, humour and strength. Though Nietzsche’s thinking only partially penetrated my younger self, he left me fortified with the necessity of going deeply into myself to fully experience life.
Over the years I read all of Nietzsche’s published books, though undoubtedly in less reliable translations and editions than are now starting to become available. Nietzsche’s aphoristic style lends itself to dipping into a few lines. Though this achieves little, it is a thought-provoking compass for how one has changed during all the years of reading the same lines. My reading of Nietzsche is changed with all the later reading and thinking I’ve done.
At the moment I’m reading Nietzsche through Walter Kaufmann, only a hundred pages or so in but enjoying his thoughts and observations. Kaufmann untangles Nietzsche’s relations with his anti-Semitic sister Elizabeth Förster-Nietzsche and the intriguing Lou Andreas-Salomé to clarify how both women set out to distort how Nietzsche’s thoughts were later interpreted. Kaufmann then proceeds to show with some elegance how the contradictions in Nietzsche’s arguments are merely superficial. He argues that Socrates is Nietzsche’s ideal, that he is not a ‘system thinker [unlike Kant or Spinoza] but a problem thinker.’
The result is less a solution of the initial problem than a realisation of its limitations: typically the problem is not solved but ‘outgrown’.
Though first published in 1950, Kaufmann’s interpretations are an inspiration for more contemporary readings of Nietzsche, one of which I also wish to read is Alexander Nehamas’ NIETZSCHE Life as Literature (1985). If you know of other Nietzsche secondary literature (not biography) worth reading please let me know.
nehamas is a good one if dated. david allison’s new nietzsche provides a good overview, likewise keith ansell-pearson & babette babich’s stuff. for political aspects and debunking the usual prejudices: tracy strong, larry hatab & h siemens. de gruyter has a good range of nietzsche stuff too
Thanks for those suggestions. I’ll explore all further.
Pingback: Reading Nietzsche Through Walter Kaufmann | Things that I liked enough to 'save for later' that maybe you'll like, too.
I took a grad class at Notre Dame on Nietsche, and the professor pretty much only recommended the Kaufmann translations. If you’re looking for Nietsche and connections to politics, I have a ton of reads I could recommend.
My plan is to reread Nietzsche as they become available in this new series based on the Colli-Montinari translations with various translators into English. This series appears to receive broad critical acceptance. What is your favourite of the secondary Nietzsche literature?
I don’t know that I have a FAVORITE, per se, I just know that I have quite a list of secondary reading from the grad class I took.
Do you ever read fictionalized accounts of Nietzsche? If so, I highly recommend Lance Olsen’s small book When Nietzsche Wept.
Thanks, Melanie, I’ll seek it out.